True Lakers Fans

Warriors 20-0. Just amazing! Dwyane Wade brought out the vintage Wade tonight as he took over and scorched OKC in the 4th Qtr. To me Wade is the 4th best Shooting Guard of all-time (if you label Havlicek a SF, some list him as a SG) only behind Jordan, Kobe, and Logo, I label Logo a SG not a PG. Oscar was more of a PG IMO. Reggie was the better shooter and Drexler was Great but Wade has the complete game and has won 3 Championships. He like Kobe are always a joy to watch because you never know when they are going to have breathtaking moments.

Wade won 2 LeBronships and that 1with Shaq is still dubious from a referee's whistle standpoint. He was better than CP3, Wall, Lillard or Rose has been up to this point.

lakerevolution wrote:Wade won 2 LeBronships and that 1with Shaq is still dubious from a referee's whistle standpoint. He was better than CP3, Wall, Lillard or Rose has been up to this point.

Without Wade. LeBron has 0 Championships JMO. LeBron is the Better player all-time over Wade but he needed Wade to win those. Wade was the best player on their 2006 team but of course having Shaq's Presence there helps Shaq was 18.4 Points and 10.8 Rebounds for the Playoffs and the guy Wade needed to help him get his first Title but Wade averaged 35 Points a game against Dallas in the Finals and just dominated.

All-time PG's
1. Magic
2. Oscar
3. Isiah
4. Cousy
5. Stockton
-My side note is this, Curry is making an argument as of now to not only be in the Top 5 but 3rd behind Magic and Oscar! I want to see if the Warriors win BacktoBack and if he wins MVP again and MVP of the Finals first before I go overboard with a ranking. Too many people get caught up in the moment when something is happening. What Curry is doing right now though is the most amazing play I have ever seen!

All-time SG's
1. Jordan
2. Kobe
3. West
4. Havlicek if a SG, he was only 6'5 205 so that is SG size. He is labled a SF/SG on most sites.
5. Wade
6. Drexler
7. Reggie
-Those are my Guard rankings

A typical Top 20 overall would be: THIS ISNT MINE
1. Jordan
2. Russell
3. Magic
4. Kareem
5. Duncan
6. Wilt, I honestly think he gets penalized by most people because of his Playoff failures.
7. Kobe
8. Bird
9. LeBron
10. Shaq
11. Oscar
12. Hakeem
13. Moses
14. West
15. Elgin
16. Havlicek
17. DR J
18. Karl Malone
19. Isiah
20. Wade

I am just saying a Typical Top 20 from the thousands of websites I have read regarding lists, this isn't my Top 20 ever just a typical one. Curry is knocking in the door though!

Timmy has made the jump to lightspeed and LeBron is appearing in Top-8's regularly too. The arrangement of Russell, Wilt and Kareem fluctuates wildly. I suppose if you're in the top ten all-time you should be honored, but I'll continue to give a little more love to post-merger stats simply because the league became more populated, modern and competitive.

tate793 wrote:Nope, 3Peat, I ain't falling for it. Not taking the bait.

Tate, that is not my list. Just how a lot of people feel in general overall. Most actually do have Bill Russell at #2 and it's because of his Titles and do have Duncan ahead of Bird. Every player in that Top 5 I showed you has at least 5 Championships won. It seems most people value Championships more than Stats when it comes to an Elite player (Role players like Horry aren't included in most discussions because they were Role Players). Not trying to start a debate as that isn't my list. I was just showing what a ton of people think and tried to be as accurate as possible in relaying it. Most do have Wade Top 20/Top 25 at worse as well. Also its about 50/50 between Kobe/LeBron/Bird by what the general public Posts. Like I said this isn't my list and I am not trying to start anything.

What's wrong with the Cavs? They lost again to the Pelicans! LeBron even had a Good game.

Through the first quarter of the season, the Eastern Conference's #9-10-11 seeds all have .500 or better records, while the West has two teams at #7 and 8 with losing records. Do I sense the winds of change, does the West just suck so far or is it because the Warriors are beating everybody?

It's safe to say Paul George is back. 15-27, 8 3's made = 48 Points but Pacers lose to the Jazz in OT.

Warriors 22-0!

Ok the Warriors are now 24-0 but have won 28 in a row technically Regular Season games (still it's 27 in a row if you just count the last 3 games of the Finals). Here's a question for everyone they have 28 Regular Season wins in a row so lets say they start 30-0 this season but that makes 34 in a row going back to last season, should they then have the right to own the longest winning streak of all-time? or does their streak need to be in the same season. Lakers own it at 33 as we all know, all in the same season.

Isn't it single-season winning streak? Gotta research.

3Peatkb24 wrote:Ok the Warriors are now 24-0 but have won 28 in a row technically Regular Season games (still it's 27 in a row if you just count the last 3 games of the Finals). Here's a question for everyone they have 28 Regular Season wins in a row so lets say they start 30-0 this season but that makes 34 in a row going back to last season, should they then have the right to own the longest winning streak of all-time? or does their streak need to be in the same season. Lakers own it at 33 as we all know, all in the same season.

Being a diehard Laker fan I won't even check.....I'm going with NO!

Lakers4Life wrote:

3Peatkb24 wrote:Ok the Warriors are now 24-0 but have won 28 in a row technically Regular Season games (still it's 27 in a row if you just count the last 3 games of the Finals). Here's a question for everyone they have 28 Regular Season wins in a row so lets say they start 30-0 this season but that makes 34 in a row going back to last season, should they then have the right to own the longest winning streak of all-time? or does their streak need to be in the same season. Lakers own it at 33 as we all know, all in the same season.

Being a diehard Laker fan I won't even check.....I'm going with NO!

The article Rev posted basically says it depends on how the person looks at things. Not just saying this because I am a Lakers fan but to me the streak has to be in the same season to count as the longest. Reason being is in between seasons you have the Playoffs.

3Peatkb24 wrote:

Lakers4Life wrote:

3Peatkb24 wrote:Ok the Warriors are now 24-0 but have won 28 in a row technically Regular Season games (still it's 27 in a row if you just count the last 3 games of the Finals). Here's a question for everyone they have 28 Regular Season wins in a row so lets say they start 30-0 this season but that makes 34 in a row going back to last season, should they then have the right to own the longest winning streak of all-time? or does their streak need to be in the same season. Lakers own it at 33 as we all know, all in the same season.

Being a diehard Laker fan I won't even check.....I'm going with NO!

The article Rev posted basically says it depends on how the person looks at things. Not just saying this because I am a Lakers fan but to me the streak has to be in the same season to count as the longest. Reason being is in between seasons you have the Playoffs.

Somebody.......Anybody needs to stop the Warrior Express